Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Atilla Büyükurvay's avatar

“Ref could have just said ‘okay, it’s NOT actually Sam, but she looks just like her’, though revealing a secret twin is a risky play. 

Remember the whole point of this is to make the world feel real and not to undermine the players’ previous choices.”

1- why would a secret twin be any more riskier than a herbalist that is made out of thin air?

2- how is announcing your players that the NPC with a broken leg was healed miraculously overnight less ‘undermining’ than coming up with a doppelganger?

This was really just a very poorly constructed example for an OK argument. Neither of the options presented are superior to one another. It’s about the delivery.

Expand full comment
Dan Strokirk's avatar

> As with other moments of improvisation, it’s best to keep the improvised content as something neither overtly beneficial or harmful to the players. Players accept that improvisation happens, but moments with significant positive or negative impact are best when they feel like part of the impartial mechanisms of the game, rather than something implemented at the whims of the Referee. 

This is an interesting opinion to me, since both as a GM and a player I would say that usually at least 80% of the game is improvised, but the paragraph implies that it would be a more uncommon thing.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts